Covers: Regulation & PolicyGovernance & Risk ManagementGovernment & Public SectorChatbots & LLMsEducationPrivacy & SurveillanceBias & FairnessMarkets & InvestmentChina & GeopoliticsAI Safety & Existential Risk
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)...AI(GPAI) models and those that pose systemicrisks. Models will be understood to pose a systemicriskbased either on a case-by-case basis by …
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)Evaluating and addressingrisksto people's privacy, civil rights, civil liberties, and safety;; Improving transparency and accountability to the …
Government & Public SectorPrivacy & SurveillanceAI Safety & Existential Risk
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)...risksbut also the systemicrisksembedded in platform architecture. ... CDT's generative AI usage policy is available here. People. CDT Europe …
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)In January, the U.S.AISafety Institute (AISI) released an updated draft of its guidance on managing therisksassociated with foundation model …
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)One of the core elements underpinning the Code of Practice is the systemicrisktaxonomy, which outlines the specificrisksthat GPAI model providers …
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)...AI and algorithmic technologies while being safeguarded from theirrisks. It does this by presenting major areas of concern for people with …
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)These priority steps address potential and existing civil rights concerns, accessibility barriers, andrisksof AI for disabled people, while …
- Center for Democracy and Technology In this round of feedback, we focussed our comments on the systemicrisktaxonomy offered by the draft code. We stressed the following points: The …
- Center for Democracy and Technology The toolkit discusses civil rights and algorithmic bias, with a description of applicable civil rights laws that impact a school's use and …
- Center for Democracy and Technology...AI systems they implement remains pivotal. Assessments of therisksand impacts of AI systems tend to evaluate a system's outcomes or performance …
- Center for Democracy and Technology Since low statistical power increases theriskof Type II errors or false negatives, auditors of AI systems will need sufficient statistical power to …
- Center for Democracy and Technology What do we mean when we talk about “assessing” AI systems? The importance of a strong ecosystem of AI riskmanagement and accountability has only …
- Center for Democracy and Technology...artificial intelligence(AI). Any subgroup n-sizes ... Brief – Unique Civil Rights Risksfor Immigrant K-12 Students on theAI-Powered Campus …
- Center for Democracy and Technology Unique Civil Rights Risksfor Immigrant K-12 Students on theAI-Powered Campus. White document on a light grey background. Ongoing public discourse …
- Center for Democracy and Technology Impact assessments that test AI decision systems for discriminationrisksand document the AI decision system's purpose, intended uses, data used …
- Center for Democracy and Technology... risks and challenges generative AI represents for European democracy. ... Analysis of Federal Agencies' Plans to Comply with Recent AI Risk Management …
Regulation & PolicyGovernment & Public SectorGovernance & Risk ManagementChatbots & LLMs
- Center for Democracy and Technology Indeed, an agency's ability to manage therisksof AI will only be as strong as its governance and oversight practices. However, the plans we …
- Center for Democracy and Technology...AI on gender equality. This workshop will provide a hands-on opportunity to engage with AI technologies and examine potentialrisksand …
- Center for Democracy and Technology The consultation inputs are intended to inform forthcoming guidelines from the European Commission, which will be prepared before the relevant …
- Center for Democracy and Technology...Artificial Intelligenceto engage with disability community members and AI practitioners to learn about therisksand benefits of AI, and to issue …
- Center for Democracy and Technology...risksthat the proposed scanning obligations pose to fundamental rights ...AI continent”, Virkkunen calls for “lowering the threshold” for European …
- Center for Democracy and TechnologyCDT was a leading voice advocating for the Biden Administration to issue an executive order on AI, and has since worked closely on the EO's …
- Center for Democracy and Technology The default rules for GPAI models centre on documentation, whereas rules for GPAI models with systemicrisksfocus on requiringriskassessments, …
- Center for Democracy and Technology This report brief was authored by Stephen Yang, CDT Summer Fellow for the CDTAIGovernance Lab. Developers and regulators have spent significant …
- Center for Democracy and Technology TheAIAct relies on arisk-based approach to regulate AI systems ...risks, the report recommends that non-compliance with these provisions …
- Center for Democracy and Technology TheAIAct's First Few Implementation Steps. Less than two months after theAIAct entered into force, oversight bodies have started convening …
- Center for Democracy and Technology...risklevels and b) types ofrisksencountered, using statistical analysis. ... GroundingAIPolicy: Towards Researcher Access toAIUsage Data. August …
- Center for Democracy and Technology In response, policymakers are scrambling to regulate AI in order to mitigate itsrisksand maximize its potential benefits. This has manifested in …
- Center for Democracy and Technology...risksand benefits of, and potential policy approaches to, openness in AI. NTIA's inquiry was particularly focused on widely-available open …
- Center for Democracy and Technology Addressing therisksthat generative AI poses to elections requires an ecosystem approach. In part, that requires focusing on the distribution of …