New product liabilityrisksfor AI products - Taylor Wessing
It also changes the current product liabilityrisklandscape significantly. What should companies using AI in products, such as a medical app, know …
Taylor Wessing 16
Covers: Regulation & PolicyBanking & FinanceGovernment & Public SectorLegal & CourtsCybersecurityHealthcarePrivacy & Surveillance
Call to evidence: use of AI in banking, pensions and other financial services to be subject to ...
Taylor Wessing The purpose of this inquiry is "to explore how the UK financial services can take advantage of the opportunities in AI while mitigating anythreatsto …
AI liability – who is accountable whenartificial intelligencemalfunctions? - Taylor Wessing
Furthermore, contractual clauses excluding or limiting liability may not cover AI and there remains significantriskfor defendants seeking to rely on …
New Product Liability Directive 2024/2853: New product liabilityrisksfor products in the EU
Taylor Wessing Lena Niehoff, David Hilger, Megan Howarth and Katie Chandler take a look into the New Product Liability Directive 2024/2853 and therisksfor …
Insurance broker sales in the digital age: Opportunities andrisksofartificial intelligence
Taylor Wessing At the same time, however, it also brings with it legal challenges. This article summarizes the current developments and legalrisksof AI in broker …
AI matters - Financial services round-up November 2024 - Taylor Wessing
One issue that central banks and regulators are grappling with is the potential financial stabilityrisksthat arise from AI, particularly as AI …
AIAct: high-risk AI systems – what applies, what is due when? - Taylor Wessing
With theAIAct, the EU has created an instrument that is essential for regulatingartificial intelligence(AI). It has been in force since 1 August …
EUAIAct and the automotive industry – legal challenges ahead - Taylor Wessing
It introduces ariskbased approach to regulating AI.AI systems posing unacceptablerisks- such as government social scoring or certain types of …
The EUAIAct from an HR perspective - Taylor Wessing
Obligations are based on the level ofriskthe use or potential use of an AI system presents, regardless of the underlying technology, with AI systems …
Fashion meets theAIAct - lowrisksystems with important transparency requirements
Taylor Wessing AI'sability to replicate designs and analyse existing collections raises potential counterfeitingrisks. Virtual models andAI-generated designs …
AI for Life Sciences Academy 2024 - Taylor Wessing
...AI output is accurate and the system robust, and managing cybersecurityrisks; IP aspects of AI systems - ensuring you have all the rights that you …
TheAIAct from an HR perspective - Taylor Wessing
AI systems are classified into fiveriskclasses: unacceptablerisks(prohibited AI),; highrisks(high-risk AI),; systemicrisks(general-purpose AI …
AI in Financial Services: Key Regulatory Considerations for EU Investment Firms
Taylor Wessing However, this potential can hardly be treated individually without the due consideration of some inherentrisksthat these AI systems may pose to the …
AI– thethreatsit poses to reputation, privacy and cyber security, and some practical ...
Taylor Wessing Cyber securitythreatssuch as phishing attacks are another area where AI'scapabilities could be misused to cause reputational damage. By sending out …
The EUAIAct and general-purposeAI- Taylor Wessing
Taylor Wessing Machine-learning based models such as GPT-4 are trained on broad data at scale and may form the basis for a range of downstream systems. This leads to …
To legislate, or not to legislate on AI? The UK government thinks it has the answer - Taylor Wessing
In its March 2023AIWhite Paper, the government proposed a sector-focused principles-based regime to regulate AI, rather thanAI-specific legislation …