Agentic AI Part II: Who is Responsible for the Actions of an AI Agent? - Technology Law
A plaintiff may argue that the vendor failed to adequately warn deployers about the foreseeable legal and operational risks of autonomous operation.
Technology Law - Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz 6
Covers: Legal & CourtsRegulation & PolicyHallucinations & FabricationRetail & E-commerceMedia & Creative WorkChatbots & LLMsAI Agents & AutomationAI Safety & Existential RiskGovernance & Risk Management
Kentucky Attorney General Files Lawsuit Against Character. AI - Technology Law
... dangerous technology that induces users into divulging their most private thoughts and emotions” and manipulates minors through “ dangerous ...
AI Safety & Existential RiskRegulation & PolicyLegal & Courts
No More Rytr's Block: FTC Reverses Course on AI Enforcement, Andrew Folks
... AI governance safeguards. Though it may mitigate some immediate risk for certain AI tool providers and deployers, it likely fuels longer-term ...
No More Rytr's Block: FTC Reverses Course on AI Enforcement, Andrew Folks
As one of the FTC's inaugural AI enforcement actions against a generative tool, Rytr put businesses on notice: turn a blind eye to AI hallucinations ...
Deflection in the Face of AI Hallucinations Ends in Rule 11 Sanctions - Technology Law
In yet another case involving AI hallucinations in court filings, the Court in Boston et al. v. Williams et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-00752 (N.D. Ga.)
Hallucinations & FabricationLegal & CourtsRegulation & Policy
Children's Advertising Review Unit (CARU) Publishes New Risk Matrix on Generative AI ...
This intersection has and will continue to pose real risk for companies implementing artificial intelligence , including in their advertisements ...